Hey, there! Log in / Register

Clang, clang, clang go the Scuba tanks: Residents near one Rockport beach sue town over divers

People living near Rockport's Back Beach say they're tired of what they say are politically connected and often malevolent Scuba divers, who clang their metal air tanks at all hours, get naked in the street, block driveways, toss their trash on people's lawns and dox or threaten residents who complain.

So they've sued the town in US District Court in Boston.

In their complaint, the members of the Back Beach Neighbors Committee say they've tried to work with the town to corral the teeming masses of Neoprene'd divers, but that while outmanned police try to help, town government is stuffed with people who make money from diving schools and who are actually trying to increase diver access to the beach, located just up Beach Street from the better known Bearskin Neck.

The neighbors claim they are being deprived of their right to equal protection, because no other beach in town is treated like Back Beach, that they are unnecessarily subjected to a nuisance, because while the divers are exercising their right to go jump in the water, the town doesn't have to make it so easy for them, that "the Town of Rockport has illegally conveyed special benefits or privileges upon divers" in violation of the state constitution, and that, in fact, the town is violating its own bylaw that prohibits diving in town harbors except for the purposes of boat repair, and that even if the bylaw were changed, the town would still be violating another bylaw that requires a permit for any commercial uses of a town beach, which the residents say includes dive schools.

The Town is solicitous of divers as a whole. Two of the members of the Town’s harbor advisory committee are divers. Members of other committees have had to recuse themselves from scuba diving issues in the past. The Town considers diving to be a useful tourist activity.

The complaint, which asks a federal judge to order the town to finally do something, details some of the complaints:

On numerous occasions on summer weekend nights, night divers have been causing noise, and clanging tanks until 1AM, while a fresh group of divers arrives at 6AM to start the day fresh, depriving the Members of sleep.

On several occasions, the Members have witnessed divers changing in the public street or sidewalk, immediately visible from the neighbor's front windows, rather than in the public facilities or on the beach. The Members have seen divers engaging in actual public nudity to change, rather than simply an issue with bathing suits. For those neighbors whose houses are within a dozen feet of the sidewalk, this is particularly distressing. Some of the neighbors have children or grandchildren who are young and impressionable.

One of the Committee was subjected to 'doxxing,' the malicious public disclosure of private personal information for purposes of embarrassment or harassment. In context, the member's information was posted to a niche divers internet forum, pointing toward the most malicious use of doxxing which is to invite or enable unknown persons to retaliate or otherwise assault against the person whose behavior is disapproved of. ...

The Town's enforcement officials, when summoned to enforce beach regulations or parking bylaws or criminal laws, will normally warn the diver. Then they will also proceed to the house of the neighbor who called, thereby revealing the identity of the complainant. The malevolent strain of divers have taken to retaliating against the Committee Members for summoning the police. ...

The Town has failed to enforce parking rules at Back Beach, lax though they are, resulting in neighbors being blocked in their driveway, unable to drive down the street, or unable to return home after being out.

Separately, to encourage divers, the Town has different parking layout and metering at Back Beach to make its access easier for strangers. The parking arrangement at Back Beach is unlike any other public area or beach in Town. The Town plans to augment this unique arrangement, to Back Beach's detriment, with forthcoming federal funding under the Complete Streets Program.

Free tagging: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete complaint123.68 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Overrun by scuba divers, breaking news at ten. Rockport selectman who are scuba divers vow to defund the police.

up
Voting closed 0

I live in Rockport. When I first read this claim I confused myself by thinking of another beach in town because contrary to the suit's claim, many other locations are popular with divers. Also contrary to the suit's claim other beaches are open to public parking. And easily accessible.

This suit is laughably proven incorrect by just driving down the street. Which isn't to say that visitors to town sometimes behave badly. But I'd be tempted to think Lionel Hutz wrote the complaint if not for the context. Given that another land owner is currently trying to block access to public land in Rockport, this instead seems like an effort to tie up town resources.

For some reason, extremely rich people are buying up coastal properties on Cape Ann (Louise Macmillan, rumored to be of the Cargill family; Scott Bogerson of Ghislaine Maxwell fame; a Russian oligarch...) and then are outraged when actual citizens live here too. These oligarchs are under the impression that their fleeting presence in a multi-million dollar mansion casts such a large shadow that no one can be within several miles of it at any point. (And surely for no other reason. The world's super rich with shipping companies at their disposal surely wouldn't be bullying other people out of the way of public land for nefarious means. Right?)

Peter & Louise, we know who you are and that makes you outraged. You picked a fight in a community where we kept a bullet in our church from the 1812 war for everyone to still see. If you had actually intended to join the community you would know something about its character. Bad choice. F*ck off.

up
Voting closed 0

Interesting! Sounds like what happens in California: 1%'ers buy up the coastline, put up illegal barriers to prevent legal public access to the ocean, and then falsely blame the public for misbehaving as justification.

up
Voting closed 0

Russian oligarchs, naked divers, bullets in churches, spicy locals??? Decided, I am taking a vaca in Rockport this summer!

up
Voting closed 0

NIMBY

up
Voting closed 0

SLAPP. A SLAPP suit is brought by deep-pocketed plaintiffs seeking to limit the "public participation" of divers in Massachusetts waters.

Facially I can't see why this is even in federal court. How does it have jurisdiction? Simply litigating that question will be expensive. The suit looks like an attempt to drain the town's budget until it submits.

up
Voting closed 0

Weak argument in this instance. They should have filed in state Superior Court seeking an order to compel the Town officials to do their duty, which would be in the nature of a "mandamus" action, but they probably realize that most Massachusetts judges would roll their eyes at this weak attempt to keep the out the riff raff. State Courts can also rule on Federal Constitutional claims, which could have been an additional count in a Superior Court complaint. As an aside, Federal Courts can and do interpret and apply relevant state laws in their proceedings. By example, the Bankruptcy Court has issued some of the most important decisions interpreting the Massachusetts Homestead statute.

The most relevant statute in this dispute is Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 91,
Section 10D: No person shall be denied access during daylight hours to commonwealth tidelands across any land available to the public for swimming or recreation which is owned or controlled by the commonwealth or any of its political subdivisions for the purpose of scuba diving or skin diving which activities are hereby declared to be water dependent uses; provided, however, that if such tidelands are at any time closed to access by the general public, such access by such scuba diver or skin diver shall not be permitted.

The truth of this dispute is most likely somewhere between the two polar opposite positions. Divers need to be respectful, and most probably are. A town with such a long history of water dependent uses should accommodate that tradition, for its own residents, as well as those outsiders who have the right to use the tidelands, and who bring revenue to the town. Perhaps a shuttle is the answer for when the public parking is full. However, if the goal is to eliminate all public parking, and any convenient use by "outsiders", then the plaintiffs in this instance should go pound sand.

up
Voting closed 0

Not In My Vacation Home's Back Yard

up
Voting closed 0

Many upvotes. Yes, people (divers) can be loud assholes, but this stinks to high heaven of "I got mine and you better GTFO from the public land abutting my property because you're not from 'round here" NIMBYism.

up
Voting closed 0

On one hand I feel bad for residents that live near places like the water who end up having to deal with people seeking access to the water. Driving around some of these waterfront communities is like entering a fortress zone with high fences and do not trespass signs.

On the other hand I have a hard time feeling bad for people who decide they want a view and access to the water but do not want others to have that same access.

I have noticed that back in the "old days" communities did a better job of carving out public space in areas with nice views and other amenities. People of means and access back then also seemed to go out of their way to build local libraries and other items for regular folk. It is almost like they thought everyone should have access to these things and that non wealthy people would leave them alone if they had access themselves.

up
Voting closed 0

I have family on the NJ shore and i've spent alot of time there. Its dumbfounding to my NJ family members seeing new england beach communities and how they are cut off from the public. The NJ shore is long stretches of open boardwalks with some exceptions. You can park anywhere along the beach or just drive along and see the water. (think hampton beach, just less trashy.. with the exception of Seaside)

up
Voting closed 0

*I hereby nominate "malevolent Scuba divers" as the Universal Hub Phrase O' the Week (BTW, is it journalistic style to capitalize "Scuba"? Just wondering)
*When I first saw the phrase in question, my first thought was of the Monty Python film/sketch featuring a life-or-death struggle between nature documentarians Heinz Sielmann and Peter Scott, who are eventually joined "by an enraged Jacques Cousteau." OK, yes, loses something in the description...

up
Voting closed 0

I second the nomination!

I don't know about journalistic style, but to be super pedantic SCUBA should be all caps since it's an acronym.

up
Voting closed 0

Definitely should be Adam's new dad band name.

up
Voting closed 0

I wonder if the malevolent divers are somehow connected with the all-powerful bicycle lobby...

up
Voting closed 0

Not a MP

up
Voting closed 0

I knew a kid growing up who accidentally saw an adult changing near a swimming hole one time and he wound up in Northampton State. Our prim New England brains cannot withstand any exposure to the naked human form without becoming at least distressed if not outright deranged.

Would like to see their list of what they think 'useful tourist activities' are. Probably

1) salt water taffy
2) art dealers selling reproductions of paintings of tall ships
3) celebrating the golden age of New England mercantilism while completely refusing to acknowledge how much generational wealth here was the result of slavery and whaling.

Love the idea that people gearing up and then literally disappearing for 30 minutes underwater is so devastating to their mental health.

up
Voting closed 0

Diver here. Been there, although not within the past 25 years. Some of the divers are inconsiderate boors. Some of the property owners at back beach are dicks. Often, the property owners see the divers as a class rather than as a collection of individuals, and somehow think that those of us who don’t happen to be inconsiderate boors ought to be held accountable for the misbehavior of those who are.

up
Voting closed 0

All dog owners are responsible for all other dog owners according to comments of some people.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

Uh oh, a town beach in Massachusetts with actual public access! Time for a federal lawsuit!

Don't tell these fine folks about the other states where the public has a guaranteed right to access all beaches, and even areas with beachfront houses have public access paths every block or so.

And metered parking? How can this stand? Everyone knows parking near the beach is supposed to be limited to people who live nearby and could have walked.

How badly would someone have to park on this street to not only block a driveway, but also block traffic from driving down the street? https://goo.gl/maps/V5akkSTSYzrEE5tC7

Loud noises, blocking driveways, and changing of clothes in public are clearly problems that can only be solved by keeping foreigners out of the area entirely.

up
Voting closed 0