Hey, there! Log in / Register

Harvard assures hourly workers of pay through the end of June, but warns of possible furloughs and layoffs after that due to large coronavirus-related losses

In a letter to the Harvard community today, university Executive Vice President Kate Lapp said that a university commitment to keep dining, custodial and security workers employed through May 25 has been extended to June 25, but cautioned that with Covid-19-related losses now expected to reach more than $1 billion, the school might have to look at the possibility of "furloughs and layoffs of some members of our workforce."

The extension of the wage guarantee applies to both Harvard employees and contracted workers, she wrote.

Lapp wrote that Harvard is already looking at roughly $415 million in losses for the fiscal year that ends June 30, in part due to reimbursements made to students for their room and board the last few weeks of the spring semester and financial assistance to students who needed help suddenly moving off campus, as well as the loss of revenue stemming from the cancellation of continuing and executive education programs and the cancellation of funds from both the federal government and private donors for work in labs that had to be shut.

The school is looking at another $750 million shortfall in the coming fiscal year, she continued.

Harvard has already frozen salaries for professors and managers, instituted a hiring freeze and begun to look at capital projects that can be deferred, she wrote. But such steps may not be enough "given the magnitude of the financial losses the university has suffered and the projected loss off revenue."

She wrote university officials are trying to figure out if the loses are temporary or permanent. If temporary, Harvard does have some financial reserves, but the school might be facing "a new normal," which would require deeper cuts, she wrote.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

"We have $40 billion in the can and we don't manufacture anything, but we're crying poor, and it'll go unnoticed."

I can't even hate. That's enviable PR and image-building.

up
Voting closed 0

Not all products are consumable. Harvard is better than 90% of large corporations. Perhaps that's not much of a compliment, but if every business was like Harvard, the world would be much better place.

up
Voting closed 0

.

up
Voting closed 0

The stock market isn't exactly doing so well. It's probably closer to $35 billion, and that's not a lot considering that they take out 1-2 billion each year. An endowment can't generate enough recurring income if there isn't a lot of money in it to begin with. Harvard, like every other big-name, big-endowment college out there, is rich, but not nearly as rich as all the haters claim.

Also, this is the same Harvard that stopped serving hot breakfast to upperclassmen in the wake of the Great Recession. Despite the inevitable student complaints and a very good pre-Covid economy, they didn't resume serving hot breakfast. So I do agree with you - their PR department is great.

up
Voting closed 0

Educate yourself on how things like endowments work, and concepts such as intergenerational equity and restricted funds. It's not as simple as '40 billion in the can.' There are legitimate questions that could be asked about Harvard's financial position, spending levels etc., but endowments don't work like a checking account.

up
Voting closed 0

Like most people, you fail to understand how endowments work.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

What more disruptive event is Harvard waiting for?

up
Voting closed 0

A lot of any school's endowment is either tied up in funds that can't be accessed, or allocated for purposes that can't be changed - legally. Lots of alumni gifts etc are legally earmarked in ways that the school can't affect - think like "$10 million to keep the hockey rink in good repair" or "$1 million to fund one professor to do research into one specific pet issue". The school isn't simply allowed to disregard those earmarks, even if they want or need to. In fact if you talk to people who work in these departments at higher ed institutions, they'll often bemoan the fact that big donors are more interested in funding things they can put their names on (e.g. a new building) - meanwhile it can be difficult to find money for small important projects as no one wants to give a big donation in order to, say, repair all the toilets in the dorms.

That said, could Harvard be doing more? Absolutely - for one, they could probably get a lot of money out of the salaries of some of their higher-ups and put it towards these workers. You could also argue that long-term they could focus their fundraising efforts more on building a more flexible endowment setup that more easily allows them to reallocate money for these kinds of needs (but that doesn't really solve the problem now). Finally, there probably is more money that is flexible that they could spend here (and aren't because they think they need to save it) - but that's certainly way less than $40 billion.

up
Voting closed 0

Even if 99.5% of Harvard's endowment had restrictions, they could still easily pay all the hourly workers for several years.

up
Voting closed 0

Ok, so instead of referring to Harvard's $40 billion endowment, let's talk about its 20% unrestricted endowment. $8 billion. That's plenty of money per hourly worker, even while preserving the principal.

And it's unclear what the 80% restricted endowment can't be spent on. It could just be restricted to a particular school or organization. So maybe some of that money could be spent on library clerks, or undergrad dining hall workers, or law school cleaning staff.

up
Voting closed 0

Yeah, nevermind the existence of legally restricted funds and operating budgets that don't draw on the actual principal. Maybe Apple has a $40 billion slush fund, but Harvard doesn't.

up
Voting closed 0

First step: send out a memo "we are all in this together" but in the future we might have to lay some workers off.
Second step: On June 26 the memo will read "Your fired"

up
Voting closed 0

a jet flyover to honor their workers.

up
Voting closed 0

I know everyone loves to dunk on Harvard, and everyone loves a good bit of broadly accepted class warfare. But beyond the fact that that crowd never knows how endowments work, Harvard is one of the largest employers in the state and most of those people aren't effete, overpaid academics. It's a deeply flawed institution, to be sure, but the eagerness to dance on the grave is so shortsighted.

up
Voting closed 0

1000 mom and pop restaurants, each owned by a family with a total net worth, including the restaurant, of $1M, each lays off one staff member, and nobody bats an eye.

A chain with 1000 restaurants and a total net worth of $1B, lays of 1,000 employees and everybody screams bloody murder, OMG those heartless bastards are sitting on a billion dollars, how could they do this heinous thing?

up
Voting closed 0

Sorry, invalid hypothetical. Harvard has a far bigger endowment per employee than the average mom-and-pop business.

up
Voting closed 0

Take the salary of the Chemistry Professor who spied for the PRC and give it to these workers?

up
Voting closed 0