Hey, there! Log in / Register

For second day in a row, Massachusetts sets new Covid-19 record

Massachusetts today reported 5,797 more positive Covid-19 test results, up from yesterday's previous record of 4,613.

The state actually reported even higher numbers, but said they included 680 cases that should have been reported earlier but were not due to a software error at the lab that did the tests.

The statewide positivity rate - the percentage of people who take a test get a positive result - is now at 7.3% when tests at colleges and universities, many of which frequently test students and staffers, are excluded.

The state also reported 1,324 people are hospitalized with Covid-19, up from 1,259 people yesterday and 1,191 on Tuesday. Speaking at the state's re-readied field hospital in Worcester today, Gov. Baker announced plans to open a second field hospital in Lowell.

Unlike the total numbers, hospitalization numbers remain below those during the spring surge.

The state reported that the hospitalization numbers include 261 people in ICUs, which is down 3 from Wednesday, but up from 239 on Tuesday.

Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Damn that’s crazy! That’s less than .090% of the population of Massachusetts . Nuts

up
Voting closed 0

If it stays at this rate per day we will double the total number of Massachusetts cases from January 1 - December 1 in 42 days. That’s January 14, or 6 days before Joe Biden is inaugurated.

Nuts, huh?

up
Voting closed 0

Good point. Point taken.

up
Voting closed 0

You'd rather more people get it?

up
Voting closed 0

Magoo is kinda ascared. Magoo.

up
Voting closed 0

Magoo is not alone. Not-Magoo.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

The hospitalization and death numbers seem to be steady or falling.
Is it making it's way through the population as expected and herd immunity kicking in? Hope so.

up
Voting closed 0

How does herd immunity lower death rates without lowering infection rates?

If you're postulating some kind of death-immunity that is distinct from infection-immunity, well, that would certainly change things. If that turns out to be the case, to hell with the Covid-19 vaccine; I want the vaccine that immunizes me against death.

up
Voting closed 0

Herd immunity is only achieved by reaching a certain threshold. We are nowhere near that number.

up
Voting closed 0

Isn't it hard to say if it's been reached or not unless every person in Massachusetts is tested?

up
Voting closed 0

New infections would not be occurring at the current rate if we had reached herd immunity. And there wouldn't be a massive effort underway to bring a vaccine to everyone ASAP if we had tragically reached herd immunity by natural means.

up
Voting closed 0

Isn't it hard to say if it's been reached or not unless every person in Massachusetts is tested?

The infection rate is being monitored by testing sewage levels of the virus. Maybe you've been avoiding those stories because ew.

up
Voting closed 0

I know you think you know what it means, but you clearly do not understand the epidemiologic dynamics that define herd immunity.

Please - just stop.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/herd....

up
Voting closed 0

More likely some combination of:

  • We're learning as we go and getting a tiny bit better at treating it.
  • The most vulnerable (at least those who are in the lucky position of being able to do so, for example by working safe white-collar work-from-home jobs) are doing a slightly better job of isolating and protecting themselves
  • The death rate lags the new case rate by weeks -- when we're on a steep upward curve the effect is significant
  • Even among those patients bound to die, we're getting better at putting it off a little longer, which makes the lag effect even more significant
up
Voting closed 0

We already infected over 50% of the most vulnerable population (nursing home residents) in Mass. There are just fewer extremely high-risk folks left to kill.

up
Voting closed 0

COVID is dangerous and serious but facts are facts. Being elderly and in poor health increases someone's risk of death from COVID but it's not a death warrant. Most people recover. Just not all of them.

Reinfections are very rare.

up
Voting closed 0

The hospitalization numbers are rising.

Mortality also isn't falling, but it's not rising like the other metrics are. 200% of the lowest recorded value, but much lower than the last peak. That probably has something to do with the medical profession figuring out how to treat it. No consolation to the 49 deaths reported yesterday.

up
Voting closed 0

Hospitalization rate take off lags infection rates.

Deaths lag hospitalization rates.

Infections are being identified earlier now, too - usually before hospitalization.

People dying today are people who became infected three weeks ago and went into the hospital one to two weeks ago.

up
Voting closed 0

If herd immunity is achieved via a vaccine (i.e. without people actually contracting covid), then that is a success.

However, achieving herd immunity via people actually contracting covid would be the absolute worst case failure scenario. It means the maximum number of people would have gotten sick. I don't know why people keep throwing this version of herd immunity around like it would be a good thing.

up
Voting closed 0