Hey, there! Log in / Register

Trust the Gorton's law ruling

Thanks to ever vigilant reader Charles Bahne, we know that the ruling in the Legal Sea Foods decision today was issued by none other than Judge Nathaniel Gorton.

But talk about the scales of justice: Turns out the connection between the judge and seafood goes deeper than just being randomly assigned a case involving a chain of seafood restaurants - Gorton is, in fact, related to the family that gave us Gorton's Seafood.

In a story last year that detailed the judge's bona fides (in a story about that college-admissions scandal that played out in large part in Gorton's Moakley Courthouse courtroom, USA Today wrote about Gorton and his brother Slade, a former US Senator from Washington state:

The brothers hail from the family that started the Slade Gorton Seafood Company in Gloucester, Massachusetts, in 1928. Their ancestors’ history in the seafood industry goes back to 1849.

The two brothers were born in Illinois, rather than anywhere near the docks of Gloucester, but Slade the senator could have been named for Slade the seafood supplier. Seafood Slade Gorton had a couple of sons, one named, like the judge, Nathaniel, according to a history of the early Gorton's company (which says Gloucester Slade started the concern after losing his job as a superintendent in a Rockport cotton mill after it burned down).

Judge Gorton, now 82, came back east to attend Dartmouth and then Columbia Law. After a stint in the Navy, he came to Boston to work as a lawyer. In 1992, President Bush appointed him as a judge in US District Court in Boston, where he has been ever since.




I'm one sixteenth Gorton--pretty sure that the seafood spur of the family comes from same common ancestor as mine, making this guy my distant cousin. That OG Gorton, Samuel Gorton, was quite the character: https://www.newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/samuel-gorton-and-his-gorton...

He arrived in 1637, started his own religious sect, and pissed folks off everywhere he went. I mean, who gets kicked out of Providence by Roger Williams?!

On another note, having worked at a Legal Seafoods, it's nice to have kept karma in the family (so to speak).

Voting closed 20

From the article:

Gorton’s flaw, as the Puritans saw it, was that he didn’t believe in their world of saints and sinners. Rather, Gorton had his own unconventional beliefs that included treating women as equals, eschewing the formal church leadership and accepting that all people are imbued with the spirit of God – beliefs similar to those adopted by the Quakers.

He may have been obnoxious in general, but it sounds like he was a great improvement over the Puritans.

Voting closed 19

Perhaps I should bring ye olde sect back...

Voting closed 9