Fernandes Anderson, whose action spurred move to ban NDAs, said fine, she can support that.
The Boston City Council today voted unanimously to prohibit councilors from requiring their employees to sign NDAs or similar documents as a condition of employment.
Among those voting yes was Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson (Roxbury), who currently faces federal criminal charges for an alleged scheme in which an NDA was involved: Prosecutors charge Fernandes Anderson hired a relative, required her to sign an NDA, then extorted a kickback from her.
The measure will apply both to current and future employees.
Councilor Benjamin Weber (Jamaica Plain, West Roxbury), who proposed the ban, said council employees need to "feel comfortable about raising concerns without fear of retaliation" - especially in public.
Before winning election as a councilor in 2023, Weber spent 20 years as a lawyer working with employees; he said he has been dismayed about the growing use of NDAs and similar employment requirements as a way to enforce control over workers and hide critical concerns.
Councilor Ed Flynn (South Boston, South End, Chinatown, Downtown) said the use of NDAs by councilors makes the public feel councilors are hiding something. He noted that Gov. Healey recently mandated an end to NDAs in state government.
Fernandes Anderson said she could vote for the measure, but said NDAs could serve a good purpose: If a councilor, "in the moment," expresses anger about another councilor, "IÂ don't want my staff tell other councilors" about that momentary heated moment.
But, "we can get rid of them, fine," she said. She added that she got the language for her NDA from another councilor, whom she did not name.
The council defeated a proposed amendment by Flynn that would have added a request to the Wu administration that it consider a similar ban across all city departments. Opponents said they would rather wait for action on an impending proposed ordinance that would mandate that.
Also expressing concern was at-large Councilor Julia Mejia, who said she was concerned the measure take into account "cultural competency" and not penalize councilors, like her, who never withhold their true feelings.
"Just because I'm aggressive and assertive and I'm spicy and sometimes a little bit too saucy for people's appetite, that my demeanor may feel a little bit uncomfortable for some," is no reason for any possible bullying, she said.
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Ad:
Comments
Wait. What? The two elected
By Frelmont
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 2:37pm
Wait. What? The two elected officials quoted herein dig the idea of silencing employees with NDAs to accommodate their own intemperance?!
P.s., intemperance and
By Frelmont
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 11:55am
P.s., intemperance and corruption for one of them as far as we know.Â
Fernandes-Anderson who voted
By Don't Panic
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 11:38pm
Fernandes-Anderson who voted yes to banning NDAs could solve her ambivalence for a complete ban by hiring competent staff instead of relatives.
A competent staff person would be to professional to spread rumors about what their councilor may have said "in the moment," expressing anger about another councilor. Hiring your relatives almost guarantees 'Gossip' spreading among staffers.
Magoo sez
By MisterMagooForYoo
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 2:41pm
<p>This is very good for Magoo. Â Magoo is starting a job at city council and Magoo is going to set up a secret squirrel tell all website. Â Magoo might call sed website Magoo Sez. Â Tee hee hee. Magoo. ?</p
Ah, hypocrisy, that hallmark
By anon
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 3:26pm
Ah, hypocrisy, that hallmark of Boston and Massachusetts politics.
Not just Boston/MA politics
By mg
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 6:35pm
Ah, hypocrisy, that hallmark of politics everywhere.
On Cue
By anon
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 3:57pm
Julia makes a crazy comment that makes no sense and is so far off topic.
She should have resigned after she live streamed a homicide. Lady is a bozo of the highest regard.
No Magoo Extension
By Pete X
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 4:01pm
Needs to be updated to "MisterMagooForYoo"
It can be done!
By monkeynaut
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 7:25pm
You can edit the preferred blocked name in the extension if you click on the "options" feature in your extension manager. I would love it if it were possible to block more than one user at a time via this extension, but I'm glad it at least serves its original purpose.
The irony...
By ScottB
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 4:36pm
Quoting the article:
She doesn't get that very behavior might be construed as bullying, especially when it comes from a public official or employer?!?! Maybe one learns to moderate one's forms of expression if others feel one might come off as a bully?
How cute
By proportionate
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 8:37pm
Our esteemed councilors think that NDA's are used to prevent employees from gossiping about their bad attitude at work. These people are completely over their skis.
note to self: Clean glasses,
By Rob
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 9:21pm
note to self: Clean glasses, then read.
Â
At first glance, I thought it was "Council bans council PDAs", and I found myself marveling at the thought that unrestrained affection among councilors was a thing.
or Palm Pilots
By deselby
Wed, 02/05/2025 - 11:19pm
.
...voting you an extra thumb
By Rob
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 12:48pm
...voting you an extra thumb-up for being not just dated enough to go to "personal digital assistant", but independent enough to think "Palm Pilot" instead of "Blackberry".
wow
By SharpWave
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 7:40am
I was like "why on earth is this even needed" but then saw that Fernandes Anderson and Julia Meija (both who just lost my vote forever) want to be able to get away with treating their staff like shit. smh
And
By robo
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 8:04am
They’re dumb enough to say it out loud!
The thing is you can have a
By anon
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 10:07am
The thing is you can have a council rule stating that employees are not to talk about council business with other employees or the public without a legal NDA. If a Councillor says something flippant and the staff member tells another staff member do we really envision them taking the staff member to court? I imagine that the only time the NDA would be attempted to be enforced is for something that would get the Councillor in real trouble legally. So yeah just have a council employee rule against just leaking info all over the place. If a staff member keeps spouting off about their boss they should be fired anyway. I can't imagine there is anything happening at the City Council that needs to be so secret as to protect with the court system.
Most NDAs are very difficult to enforce anyway. I had a boss once that had me sign an NDA and non compete clause that ended up having to lay me off. He was nice enough to tell me he would rescind both so I could find other employment and I laughed. I told him that his documents wouldn't stand up to the legal system anyway and I signed them just to avoid an argument. The field we were in they were completely not needed.
Add comment