Hey, there! Log in / Register

What do people in crime-ridden Boston neighborhoods really want?

City workers plan to ask them. I don't live in one of those neighborhoods, but I'm betting they're going to say they want the city to do something about things like this:

As hundreds of mourners sat in Greater Love Tabernacle Church in Dorchester yesterday morning for the funeral of shooting victim Andre Stoner, word spread through the church that Stoner's cousin had been found hours earlier in a nearby elementary school parking lot, dead of a gunshot wound to the head.

Now the congregation in this neighborhood beset by crime had two victims to mourn. Relatives screamed and ran toward the back of the church, confused mourners ducked into their seats, and white-gloved ushers tried to bring the chaos under control, but Stoner's funeral had already been overtaken by a new round of grief for Nicholas Copeland, 20. ...

Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

There's something sorely lacking in our society when things like this are allowed to go on. Addressing the root causes of this horrific situation, which are many, and are complex, would go a long, long way towards dealing with and hopefully eradicating this problem, which, I believe, is the longterm result of people being confined to ghettoes and not being allowed access to housing in other parts of the city.

In the spring of 1968, shortly after MLK's assassination, then-Mayor Kevin H. White announced a program, B-BURG(Boston Banks Urban Renewal Group), which was ostensibly geared towards helping low-income first-time African-American buyers obtain FHA (Federal Housing Admn.)-insured mortgages and attain the responsibility of home ownership for the first time. B-BURG was a consortium of some 20 Boston-area banks that operated in partnership with Real Estate Agents. For the B-BURG experiments, the Jewish areas of Roxbury, North Dorchester and Mattapan were chosen and effectively "red-lined", in many cases denying black homebuyers decent housing that they'd found, which were just afew blocks outside the "redlined" B-BURG areas.

Real Estate Agents frequently warned Jewish family to "sell and get out now before property values declined". With the advent of threats, arsons, break-ins and fire-bombings, most of the remaining Jewish families residing in the "redlined" B-BURG areas fled, as a consequence of the panic-induced blockbusting. Because of the overtly racist campaigning on the part of the banks and real estate agents affiliated with the
B-BURG program, B-BURG was nothing short of a disaster. I believe that had B-BURG allowed blacks and other minorities access to housing throughout the city, instead of engaging in the "redlining" of the Jewish areas, that neighborhoods and schools alike would've been much more integrated, much safer, and there would've been better schools for both non-white and white Boston public school students alike.

Far from helping people break out of the ghetto, B-BURG had only enlarged, expanded, extended and reinforced it, resulting in an impoverished, crime-and-drug-infested ghetto, which still exists today. In the late 1960's, then-Illinois governor Otto Kerner
warned "that the nation was developing into two nations, one black, one white, separate and unequal" Had efforts gotten underway to dismantle the ghettoes and create integrated neighborhoods, including here in Boston, there would not be so many problems and the crime rate would not be nearly as intense. I also believe that, had the B-BURG program been carried out differently, there would've been a far better chance of neutralizing the late Louise Day Hicks and her cronies on the Boston School Committee, thus derailing her/their crusade(s), thus eliminating the need for divisive policies such as mandated school busing, which made many people more angry, fearful and suspicious of each other.

Jules Witcover's book The Year the Dream Died: Revisiting 1968 Here in America, points this out very succintly by the following quotation "These kids don't understand that when they're killing each other, it's because thirty years ago, nobody did anything to alleviate the problems in their neighborhood(s)" This particular quote, I believe, says it all, in a nutshell.

up
Voting closed 0

So you're saying that forcing black people to live together in Mattapan 40 years ago is causing black people in Roxbury and Dorchester to murder each other every other day? Maybe if we integrated Boston years ago, you wouldn't have the "critical mass" of black people that causes them to go all homicidal?

That's some perceptive social thinking you've got there.

up
Voting closed 0

Unlike the white European ethnic groups (i. e. Irish, Italians, Jews, etc., ) who emigrated here on their own, and who also suffered oppression both in the Old world and here in the United States, the oppression, the institutional racism and marginalization against black Americans has been ongoing and constant, both in times of relative plenty and during leaner, meaner times. Isolation and marginalization from society's mainstream has resulted in anger, low self-esteem, and "internalization" of the marginalization, which, imho, goes a long way towards explaining why the incidence of black-on-black crime here in Boston and the USA at large is as high as it is.

A number of years ago, I watched a program on TV (I forget which program, however), that involved the debate about the merits of legalizing illicit drugs here in the United States. One debator, a white person, totally supported legalization of drugs, while the woman, an African-American, totally opposed it, arguing that drugs contributed heavily to the criimes in black neighborhoods, and legalization would make it worse. The African-
American woman went on to point out that when people who've been severely oppressed and marginalized are all together in one place, they tend to just destroy each other.

I believe that this woman's points were well-taken, and she pointed that out very articulately.

up
Voting closed 0

You can point to numerous reasons why the community is in such dissaray, but you have not offered any solutions. This might not go over well with the liberals, but big gov't programs only make the problem worse. Depending on the gov't for everything helped contribute to these problems.

up
Voting closed 0

dismantling the ghettoes and creating integrated neighborhoods is the best and most idealistic way to do it. There's no guarantee that crime wouldn't occur, but it would certainly cut down on crime.

up
Voting closed 0

that is crazy. explain how one dismantles a neighborhood.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0

The various institutions should've worked to alter the housing patterns and create integrated neighborhoods, as opposed to neighborhoods that're segregated.

up
Voting closed 0

So - if I understand correctly, pouring morally, ethically, and motivationally bankrupt populations into great neighborhoods will benefit the population as a whole? I think not. It will just lower the bar as a whole, tainting the populous and leaving nothing respectable behind. Look at how rap music has dumbed down America as a whole!

up
Voting closed 0

One palce that needs a lot of help is NEw Bedford the south end is falling apart and the govt is not hlping its one of the porest regions. Crime is sky rocketing like crazy. Ppl are lucky if nottin bad happens to them in the southend of NEw Bedfrod.

up
Voting closed 0