Hey, there! Log in / Register

Man shot at Ashmont T station

The scene outside Ashmont station. Photo by David Finnerty.

Boston Police report a man was shot around 7:40 p.m. just outside the station.

Officers on patrol saw the shooting and immediately took off after the suspect on foot. Police say they captured Balfour McLean, 22, of Dorchester, on Alban Street and charged him with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, illegal possession of a firearm and illegal possession of ammunition. They also recovered the Ruger 357 firearm they say he discarded during the chase.

The victim was taken to the hospital with serious injuries, but is expected to survive, police say.

Dorchester Avenue was shut for the investigation.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I'm sure I asked this before, but is there a mandatory automatic minimum sentence for discharging a weapon within X feet of a public transit station?

up
Voting closed 0

Don't know, but hope so.

up
Voting closed 0

Crime within the city limits outside of special circumstances and at the federal building ranges, BPD range, and the one local gun club.

Crime within a certain distance of an occupied dwelling.

Crime within a certain distance of a public right of way.

Not that any of those charges are every applied by a prosecutor though.

Guys will be out in 3-5 or less with time served and the mandatory minimums for illegal possession will be ignored. Not to be cynical but that seems to be the normal treatment for gangbangers.

up
Voting closed 0

If it is within City Limits, why should it make a difference?

up
Voting closed 0

Some states have different laws depending on if you are incorporated (city) limits or on unincorporated land. For at least a century, maybe two, there hasn't been unincorporated areas in Massachusetts. You are always within city/town limits in the commonwealth. I'm unaware of any unincorporated areas anywhere in New England.

up
Voting closed 0

There are unincorporated areas in Maine, Vermont, and I think NH.

up
Voting closed 0

but it only carries a MAXIMUM of three months! There are no other crimes for discharge near particular places.

up
Voting closed 0

But I suspect that discharging a weapon into a person carries a heftier sentence than simply discharging a weapon.

But really, should be we be locking up people for years for simply firing a gun?

up
Voting closed 0

Discharging a firearm in a heavily populated are is dangerous for numerous reasons. For a negligent discharge (such as someone accidentally letting around off through carelessness) I'm in favor of taking away their ability to obtain and keep firearms.

If someone doesn't have a firearms license, doesn't have a firearm registered and lets a round go, I'm in favor of putting them away for a while.

up
Voting closed 0

I was just responding to the comment about discharge within a certain distance from a train station. The "discharge" statute would be useful when a gun is fired but no one is hit (or sticks around to report having been shot at, constituting an assault with a dangerous weapon).
And what would you suggest is the appropriate consequence for people who "simply" fire a gun?

up
Voting closed 0

it appears by the crime scene tape that the station managed to dodge the gunfire so the T will report they have no reports of gunfire or injuries at the station.

up
Voting closed 0

Was across the street from where it happened. Right in front of the station, by the taxi cabs, not 20 ft from the front door of Ashmont T station. I'm not sure if the victim survived but I hope so. Never have seen a man get shot before, never want to again. Within literally 2 minutes, 10+ police vehicles had pulled up and three ambulances. Wish they'd be there all the time so this stuff doesn't happen in my neighborhood.

up
Voting closed 0

Serious injuries, but police said they were not life threatening.

up
Voting closed 0