Hey, there! Log in / Register

Erin Murphy to stay a Boston city councilor

Lisa Kashinsky reports Democratic voters in Suffolk County have picked Allison Cartwright, who has actual legal and managerial experience, as the next Suffolk County clerk of the Supreme Judicial Court.

Results posted by the Boston Election Department show Cartwright won the city by a roughly 60-40 margin.

Voters can now go back to not knowing or caring about the position, either for November, since there's no Republican candidate, or for as long as Cartwright chooses to keep the job - she will replace Maura Doyle, retiring after 30 years from the job.

Cartwright defeated at-large Boston City Councilor Erin Murphy, who was an elementary school teacher before winning election as an at-large city councilor, a job she will hold at least until the fall, 2025 elections.

Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

I'm glad this position won't go as a sinecure to a toady who once wanted to declare a "public health crisis" over street sweepers "spreading diseases" from the Mass and Cass corridor onto our fair City Upon a Hill. They say your portfolio is only as good as your worst work, and in my mind at least there was never any coming back from that ignominious incident.

up
Voting closed 117

It was disconcerting that a qualified lawyer could lose to a well known politician who clearly lacked the qualifications and was just looking for an easy paycheck. Glad people made the right call.

There was an interview in the Globe with a guy who proudly boosted he votes in every election as his civic duty but since he didn't have time to research the candidates he was voting for Murphy since she, "was an established politician" (paraphrasing). Yuck. If you don't do a little research on the candidates beyond yard signs and endorsements, just don't vote. Civic duty is more then just filling in the bubble.

up
Voting closed 119

Will someone please list the daily duties of Suffolk County Clerk of the Supreme Judicial Court?
Also if someone educated enough, as I certainly am not, can rate the necessity of this ($170,000?) position on a scale of 1 (being
not at all necessary) to 10 (absolutely necessary for the Supreme Judicial Court to function daily).

).

up
Voting closed 34

The Clerk's Office for the County of Suffolk is primarily responsible for the single justice caseload of the Supreme Judicial Court, administrative and disciplinary matters filed by the Board of Bar Overseers affecting members of the bar, and matters relating to Bar Admission and the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

In English, that means the clerk oversees emergency matters filed with the SJC, which initially are reviewed by a single justice, she oversees hearings before the SJC involving lawyers accused of doing bad things and she oversees the procedures for admitting new lawyers in Massachusetts and ongoing ethics and other regulations for lawyers in the state.

up
Voting closed 58

It's a job that 50 years ago would have been done by someone with a high school diploma.

up
Voting closed 18

Most clerkships are done by recent law school graduates.

up
Voting closed 18

In November I'm writing in Elvira Pixie Palladino

up
Voting closed 24

She was an out and proud racist.

up
Voting closed 21

...nobody under 55-60 will get it.

up
Voting closed 18

Always vote even if you have no clue who is running for anything.

Just submit a blank ballot. It pushes up the participation rate and does no mischief.

While I'm at it: Never vote for an unopposed candidate; they don't need your vote and it doesn't encourage the one party state.

up
Voting closed 29

I vote for unopposed candidates if I actively like them/approve of their policies. For the most recent primary, that meant I marked the bubbles for my Congresswoman and state senator, but not the one for my "representative in general court." I've lived in his district for a couple of years, and can't think of anything he's done, good or bad

What I won't do is vote for someone based on no meaningful information about either the candidate or their opponents. Voting against a candidate makes sense, if there's a significant reason for me to oppose them, including policy, experience, or being endorsed by someone who I disagree with or distrust. Bad reasons would be things like having the same first name as someone I don't like, or playing guitar badly, since we're not electing people for a neighborhood band.

up
Voting closed 22

we should all be advocating for the elimination of this elected office.

up
Voting closed 36

The job is necessary - this week we also had someone appointed to this position. What needs to be eliminated is having an election for a job that should be given based on qualifications.

up
Voting closed 64

You could make the same argument regarding every other elected position.

up
Voting closed 21

Those positions that involve actually representing people and debating the issues/making laws (read: General Court, Senate, and Governors Council (though this one could probably be eliminated with its duties folded into the Senate, tbh)) should absolutely be subject to the will of the voters. Similarly, I'm fine with cabinet level officerships like Secretary of the Commonwealth and Attorney General being elected, though, tbh, I'd also be okay with making it Governor appointed and Governor's Council/Senate approved.

Those positions that (ideally) only involve rote implementation of law/policy/bureaucracy should absolutely NOT be elected. Bringing politics into it can only possibly hurt the outcome. It's actually not bad here compared to lots of other states where they vote for all kinds of things that shouldn't be put to a public vote, like judges and "coroners."

Positions we currently elect that should be appointed/hired instead:
Register of Probate
Register of Deeds
Clerk of Courts

up
Voting closed 13

This is surprising. Murphy if nothing else is a relentless self promoter. She never ever misses a photo opp or a community event. Her name recognition has to be among the highest in Boston politics. Cartwright has almost no name recognition.

The progressive endorsements obviously worked for Cartwright, but Murphy had what I thought would be impactful endorsements from conservatives and "moderates". Maybe the Lynch/Collins/Fitzgerald crowd just got back from the Cape Monday night and were too tired to vote.

The best thing is that Nee-Walsh won't be taking a seat on the Council. Murphy is right of center but Nee-Walsh is a right wing extremist.

up
Voting closed 69

Any receipts on that claim?

up
Voting closed 32

"Black Lives Matter set back race relations 50 years"

https://www.universalhub.com/2023/city-council-candidate-claims-black-li...

up
Voting closed 33

and I didn't vote for her due to that comment. But I was considering her prior to that incident because her policies did seem generally more progressive than those of some other choices (ie Murphy).

up
Voting closed 9

This is what happens when you send all your constituent service requests to the 311 poop hole. The voters remember.

up
Voting closed 28