Hey, there! Log in / Register
It's not over yet, right?
By adamg on Tue, 10/16/2007 - 11:40pm
Although the fact that the Sox don't have a starter besides Beckett who can get past the fifth inning is a bit worrying, no?
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
We've got 'em right where we want 'em
Remember the Sox are the team that makes a habit of digging big holes for themselves in the postseason. See 1999 vs. Cleveland, 2003 vs. Oakland, and 2004 vs. New York. It will be that much more fun when they win the next three and then beat the Rockies.
Also 1986 vs Anaheim
Good Point
Although that opposing franchise was known as the California Angels at that time.
As bad as the final score looks, it all comes down to two misplayed balls in the 5th. If either one of them is fielded cleanly the inning ends with Cleveland only scoring 2 runs and the Sox win 3-2. So the message for the Sox tomorrow night? Don't screw up.
Or ...
The Sox go into the eighth leading 3-2 and Francona puts Gagne in ...
I would not have removed Wakefield
What did I say?
The Red Sox had it in the bag all along.