Hey, there! Log in / Register

The unicorns of the MBTA


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

It's particularly amusing when you check the T website for a Lechmere train, head to the station 5 minutes before it says it's gonna come so as not to miss it, only to wait another 15 mins for the next one.

Maybe they ARE invisible and only Big Bird can see them...

up
Voting closed 0

...is nice for planning routes. I would never trust it for times of any subway or bus.

up
Voting closed 0

they could get away with it, current MBTA managers would like nothing better than to totally abandon the Green Line east of Government Center.

It's bad enough that they don't run service to and from North Station and Lechmere frequently enough. It's even worse when they intentionally delay cars coming from North Station to 'reposition' BC and Riverside cars that are either turning on the GC Loop or have short turned at Park Street.

One of their latest tricks during rush hour is to short turn C cars at Government Center, run them around the GC loop in front of LOADED C cars arriving from North Station, and then HOLD the second C car (the one with all the folks who got on at North Station) for a 5 minute 'headway adjustment' at Park Street.

Almsot as bad as their standard practice of looping empty BC trains directly in front of loaded E trains (either at GC or Park Street), then holding the BC train for 'headway adjustment' - thus delaying the E train, which can't berth until the BC train has left. NEWS FLASH TO MBTA DISPATCHERS AND MANAGEMENT - the station platforms at Government Center and Park Street are at least TWO two-car train lengths long!!!!!!

up
Voting closed 0

It makes no sense to me why the two branches with the lowest ridership are the ones that offer service to Lechmere and North Station. At first glance it might seem logical, but when you consider:

a) the fact that these trolleys come less often (don't remember the exact stats...anyone?), and:

b) that once they hit the central subway they all generally pick up lots of people (furthermore, I'd argue the Lechmere/NS trolleys end up picking up MORE people than GC ones both because of 'a' above and because they stand around, gathering on the platform, waiting for these specific trains),

it just seems wonky and makes for unnecessarily overly-packed trolleys carrying a bunch of necessarily crabby commuters. Add to all this that two of the major Central Subway stations aren't serviced by Lechmere trains.

Perhaps the T uses the argument that the E line is the shortest, so naturally goes the farthest east. That does seem to fit in with their mantra of "our #1 concern is for the safety and convenience of our employees."

up
Voting closed 0

The E line runs 1/2 as often as any other line (though to be honest, it's packed to the brim whenever I ride it), and it's the only to Lechmere. People around Copley/Arlington usually get pissed because they've waited 8-15 minutes for one, only to have it be completely full from people who get on at Prudential.

It's asinine that only the E line runs to Lechmere, but that's par for the course unfortunately.

up
Voting closed 0

And yes! Having it already be full, mainly with people who are only going as far as Park Street. I know this is not a solution, or at least is one with flaws, but sometimes I wish that during rush hours the North Station trolleys (or at least most of them) would skip the Park Street stop, just so they wouldn't be so crowded.

up
Voting closed 0

Might not be a bad idea.

Probably the biggest problem I run into trying to make my commuter rail train during evening rush is the sheer number of trains + the sheer amount of time it takes for nearly the entire train to unload at Park creating a massive backup between Park and Boylston.

I also don't understand why they don't unload 2 trains at the same time at Park, especially when the next train in line waiting to unload is completely inside the station.

up
Voting closed 0

rear-ender inbound at Copley Station. Shortly after this, the subsequent 'no unloading two trains at once' practice was instituted at the request of the state Department of Public Utilities (now Division of Telecommunications and Energy), who investigated the accident.

The delay this policy creates entering Park Street or Government Center is bad enough. What really frosts me though is when a train pulls into North Station behind another one, but is fully on the platform, and sits there for 3 to 5 minutes until the front train pulls out (so the second train can advance to the designated 'berth' area') More than once in that situation I or another passenger have asked the operator to open the doors and have been rebuked with the comment "We're not on the platform yet!"

up
Voting closed 0

Thanks Roadman,

This had been irking me for quite a while, and I'm glad to know that there was a reason (I actually wrongly assumed it was due to the Boylston rear-ending not too long back). It's really a poor policy all-around, especially considering how slowly the drivers pull into most of these stations.

up
Voting closed 0

It was all the DTE for a while... recently they did the right thing and split it into the DTE and the DPU.

up
Voting closed 0