Hey, there! Log in / Register

Boston assesses building that sold for $1.6 million as worth only $332,000

Harry Mattison reports on the decaying hulk that is the former Black and Decker building at the gateway to Allston on Western Avenue, says it hasn't decayed that much to drop several hundred thousand dollars in value in just one year, which means the city is losing out on several thousand dollars in tax revenue.

Neighborhoods: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Commercial properties are not assessed based on resale values like residential property. They are assessed based essentially on a multiple of net operating income (rents less expenses not including debt). From the picture - this structure is essentially worth zero - even if the underlying land sold for 1.6 million - the value is thus only on the land which is taxed at very low rates. I don't know all the details - but the assessing dept is probably in the ballpark on this one based on the law (also - even if they assessed it at $36,000 - it won't add a single dollar to the city's coffers under prop 2 1/2 - common misconception - the only advantage is that other taxpayers might see about a fraction of one cent lower taxes).

The bigger problem is what is going to happen to the commercial office buildings - the 200 largest buildings in the city pay about half the city's commercial property taxes. However, with rents down and vacancies and interest rates up this puts a double whammy on commercial property values. As I've commented before - if commercial taxes paid decrease about 10% (roughly $90 million)the taxes don't go away - the residents will have to pick up that slack - translating to a 20% or so increase in residential taxes (without getting into the math - maybe 25% for the average person getting the residential exemption). The property tax system in this city is a ticking time bomb and our city government is doing nothing legislatively or financially to diminish this risk - willing to rely on the boiling frog theory that they will be out of office by the time it becomes a serious problem. When I moved here 16 years ago our taxes were almost ridiculously low - now they are on par with the suburbs and will be moving up rapidly if we don't overhaul the system and soon.

up
Voting closed 0

Stevil,

I agree with a lot of what you write on this website, but I don't agree that this property is assessed correctly. All property in Boston (residential and commercial) is supposed to be taxed based on "its full and fair market value". The ruling in Boston Gas Co. v. Assessors of Boston provides the following definition:

"the fair market value of property is the price on which a willing seller would sell the property to a willing buyer in an arm’s-length sale if neither party was under compulsion and each was aware of all relevant facts."

The "income method" of assessing that you mention is, according to the City, "most useful in valuing investment property where sufficient market sales are not available". When a property has just been sold, there is no lack of market sale data and the complexity of estimating the income-producing capacity of a vacant parcel is not appropriate.

You are right that a correct assessment wouldn't add any money to the City's coffers, but it would make this landbanking less financial attractive and reduce the negative impact of this practice.

http://www.cityofboston.gov/assessing/default.asp.
http://www.cityofboston.gov/trac/faq/assessing_val...

up
Voting closed 0

I agree with you about full and fair market value - and I think any logical thinking lay person would agree with you - unfortunately logical and thinking lay people don't get to interpret these convoluted laws - courts do and as a result I believe all commercial property in the city is valued under the income method - which seems to consistently undervalue property by about 50% according to an ongoing study by the ABN of commercial resale values vs. assessed values. That's why the argument many commercial property owners make that they are "unfairly burdened" by classification (which raises their assessed values by 75%) doesn't really hold water (they hate it when I point out that inconvenient truth).

Part of the problem is that these deals tend to get very complicated - all kinds of things get factored into the transfer prices on commercial properties like leasing renewal rights, tax benefits, naming rights, options on other properties etc. so as a rule the income method is a little more practical or you'd end up in court on a lot of transactions fighting over the value of all these incidentals. I'm guessing this property probably has essentially no salvage value for improvements and thus was assessed essentially as a parking lot.

The buyer will probably negotiate with the BRA to triple the FAR, kick back a park to the neighborhood and pocket a few million bucks. Doesn't make it right - just the way the real world works around here.

up
Voting closed 0