Hey, there! Log in / Register

Revamping Central Square

CentralSquare.com has posted reports from several committees looking at the future of the Cambridge business district, with ideas ranging from creation of a full-service visitor information center, new plantings and better lighting. Some merchants want to create a "business improvement district," like the one in Downtown Crossing that would include hiring "ambassadors" to greet visitors - and broom panhandlers from the area (one landowner proposed removing all the benches in the square as a way to discourage the loitering classes).

One committee dealt with Central Square's "messaging" and came up with an elevator pitch:

Central Square is the pulse of Cambridge; an eclectic urban neighborhood where cultures mix, mingle and create. Day or night, Central Square is a vibrant destination for dance, theater, music, and global cuisine.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Get rid of the drunks and druggies. That will solve most of the problems right there.

up
Voting closed 0

They used to have a small "cop station" right out there in front of Libbys--kind of an extended phone booth where you could generally see/find a cop. It was a good idea, I think. Kept the public urinal aspect of Central down and was also good for traffic (and I mean both car AND bike) issues.

I'd really like to see more of a semi-permanent police presence there.

up
Voting closed 0

The new Jill Brown-Rhone plaza near Toscanini's has become quite popular. Removing the benches there would hurt the ice cream store and probably other neighboring businesses too.

up
Voting closed 0

Oh no! Then would Toscanini's have to beg for 100K to pay off back taxes they forgot to pay again? Oh no! Maybe instead of those crooks screwing people for overcharging for mediocre ice cream, the people of Cambridge could have paid for some program to help the druggies and homeless, or at least move them further up the street.

I have a slogan "Central Square - up and coming since 1989"

Seriously - I like Central square, but even at noon you have an atmosphere that feels like the edge of Mattapan. Just putting in a Gap and a Starbucks and a BSC doesn't mean the scary people go away.

Don't fool yourself folks.

up
Voting closed 0

This is just a politically correct way of saying what I'm saying, i.e., "get rid of the drunks and druggies."

up
Voting closed 0

I think that there are at least two homeless shelters in Central. One on Pine (where Charles Stuart's brother recently died) and another in back of the Starvation Army. That's where most of the bums come from, during the day. As long as those shelters are there, we're going to have their residents in the neighborhood. Benches--or lack of them--don't have a whole lot to do with it.

I have no problem with them being in the neighborhood, btw. I jusr wish that there was a more consistent street-based police presence.

up
Voting closed 0

I do have a problem with the public drinking, littering, urination, and fights, activities which seem to track closely with the homeless population.

up
Voting closed 0

Most people who are homeless don't engage in any of these things. Most are working, raising families, etc. and you wouldn't know that they're any different from any other person you see taking the train or grocery shopping.

The people you're seeing disturbing the peace and urinating and whatnot are a very small portion of people who are homeless, and you only notice them as being any different because of their behavior. For what it's worth, many of the people you see out and about with poor hygiene, poor social skills, carrying around lots of belongings, and a tendency to loiter and bother people -- people who you might label as "a homeless person" -- are people with major mental illness who do have a permanent residence.

up
Voting closed 0

But this proportion of the homeless population who cause problems on the street are highly concentrated in Central Square, because that's where the only wet shelter is.

up
Voting closed 0

That's why I'm singling out the druggies and alcoholics that inhabit Central Square. Working homeless families are not hanging out in Central Square drinking, fighting, dealing drugs, urinating, engaging in petty theft from businesses, etc.. They are not the people that I'm complaining about.

There is a specific group of people that is causing the problems in Central Square. I believe my complaints have been fairly clear on this point, but my apologies if there has been any confusion. I am certainly not trying to demonize people who are simply down on their luck or don't have the financial resources or family support networks that most of us fortunately have.

up
Voting closed 0

There are three shelters, most problematically CASPAR, and a profusion of public-service agencies that cater to vulnerable populations. There's logic in that concentration; it makes it cheaper and easier to provide services. But there's also an enormous cost.

The city doesn't want to own up to this. For one thing, there are lots of voters who recoil from any criticism of the behavior of vulnerable populations, or from the suggestion that the generous provision of services tends to attract an even larger and more demanding population of beneficiaries. But more to the point, accepting responsibility for the situation would mean either spending more money, or dispersing the population over a greater area. Neither is politically palatable to the rest of the city.

There's no real reason why Central Square couldn't be cleaned up, even with the shelters there. But it would mean adding city staff to offset the additional burdens placed on the area by the shelter population. The city, instead, has preferred to convene red-ribbon panels that come up with the same tired ideas, and avoid tackling the issue of the homeless population at all because they've been told it's outside their purview. And it would rather see the business tax themselves in the form of a BID than spread the burden of the costs more equitably over the city - including the businesses of Kendall, Inman, Harvard, and Huron which benefit from the displacement of their own potential homeless populations into Central.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm planning an experiment. I'm going to email each of the candidates for city council about this issue and see whether they respond and what they plan to do about it.

This is sole criteria on which I will base my votes.

I emailed two a few years ago, Denise Simmons and I think Henrietta Davis, about this issue and neither wrote back.

Time to put some pressure on those in charge.

up
Voting closed 0

The plaza near Toscanini's is a great success. It's one of the few gathering places in Central that actually works -- people hang out there with their friends. The only similar place in Central is the lawn in front of City Hall on a sunny day.

What can we do to make the scary plaza at Mass Ave and Western more like the Toscanini's plaza?

up
Voting closed 0

Right now I believe the bordering businesses are a bank and a cell phone store, neither of which draw the kind of people you'd necessarily want to linger.

up
Voting closed 0

would any first-world urban area look to Downtown Crossing for style improvement tips?

up
Voting closed 0

The problem facing Central Square is fairly simple: CASPAR. It's one of the region's few "wet" shelters. It has a nominal capacity of 107 beds, but routinely hosts as many as 130. And after the sun rises, it turns those residents out into the surrounding streets. That is, into Central Square. They drink. They litter. They commit petty crimes. They urinate and defecate in the streets. They stew cigarette butts around themselves. They sleep on the benches. They fight. They yell profanities.

It doesn't make for the region's most attractive shopping district.

On paper, the shelter serves five communities - Cambridge, Somerville, Arlington, Watertown and Belmont. In practice, it attracts homeless individuals with chronic substance abuse problems over a substantially greater range. Even in those communities, that's 275,000 people who manage to rid themselves of the daily hassle of confronting homeless drunks by dumping them in the laps of the few thousand residents of Central Square. Those communities pitch in to cover the operating costs of the shelter. But they don't pony up for the ancillary costs.

There's absolutely no reason that Central Square businesses ought to have to cover these costs themselves by forming a BID. There are better and more cost-effective solutions here than employing 'greeters' to roust the homeless and make them feel unwelcome. For starters, the five communities that are dumping their drunks in the square could pay for full-time workers to keep Central Square clean, and for a full-time police patrolman to walk the beat while CASPAR is closed. CASPAR itself could behave more responsibly, denying admission not just to those who engage in abusive behaviors in the shelter - which they do already - but also to those who engage in similar behaviors in the surrounding streets. If a resident can lose his bed by assaulting a staff member in the shelter, shouldn't he also lose his bed if he assaults another homeless man on the street?

When Cambridge began to overhaul Harvard Square, it expanded the shelter beds available in Central, in a deliberate effort to shift its problem population. Well, now it's time to pay the piper. Central is similarly poised for revitalization. There's no place to kick the can further down the road. The solution is to pay all the indirect costs that have been foisted onto Central Square. It's in the city's longterm interest to do so. And it's in the interest of the surrounding communities to make the burden of CASPAR more sustainable, because if they don't ante up, they may very well face a backlash sufficient to shut CASPAR down. And the very last thing that the hipsters of Somerville or the yuppies of Arlington want is a wet shelter in their own neighborhoods.

up
Voting closed 0

Sounds good to me. All I know is that as a resident of the area, I'm tired of the square being filled with some of the most disgusting people I've ever seen, who substantially degrade the environment for everyone else. I have sympathy for those who are sick, but I have a lot more sympathy for the residents and business owners in the area, quite frankly.

up
Voting closed 0

Last week, I did some unauthorized litter cleanup on Green Street. I couldn't believe how many empty nip bottles there were. Maybe the city should ask the two liquor stores to stop selling nips.

And a better police presence on Green Street could help. A lot of homeless people walk from CASPAR to the liquor stores on Green Street, and get in fights with each other in the process.

up
Voting closed 0

Well, moving or closing CASPAR is not a good solution. The bums won't just disappear; they'll just move elsewhere. Clearly the answer is to put a dollar figure on the expense they're causing in Central Square (more policing, more street cleaning) and add it to the CASPAR budget.

up
Voting closed 0

Unfortunately you're never going to rid yourself of the panhandlers. They'll just stand and block your way to beg for money. They are everywhere, until the city(s) combat it with a big push, they'll always be there. Plus the T being RIGHT there and TONS of foot traffic, makes it an easy place for panhandlers to get money.

As far as Central Square, I don't know what people are complaining about. Central Square has come A LONG way in the 12 or so years that I've lived there. There's better stores, its not so ghetto. And as I understand it, Central Square of the 70s and 80s was a pit and crime ridden. No one used to go there for anything. Its actually kind of nice now verses the way it used to be.

Yeah new vegetation and a visitors center might be nice, but would it work? Not really. And Ambassadors?!? I've yet to see how they've been effective in Downtown Xing, except picking up the trash.

The other thing is, Central Square isn't really a destination (unless you have a specific reason to go there, like the Middle East). I always see Central Square as a 'pass thru' destination. You're always going there to get to somewhere else. Like, walking to Inman Square down Prospect. Or Riding the T THRU Central Square. Or Taking a bus to somewhere else. Or walking up Mass Ave TO Harvard.

yeah maybe having a different set of shops might help, but unlike Harvard. There's no yard or Cambridge Common. Or Inmann (where there's a TON of restaurants, Central just doesn't have the space). It'll just be a pass through to somewhere else.

up
Voting closed 0

Plenty of reasons to go there and stop there:

Restaurants of many different ethnicities (probably rivalling Inman Square)
Coffee shops and bakeries (1369, Lyndell's which used to be Carberry's)
Post office
YMCA (and its theatre)
Central Square Theatre
Toscanini's
Live music at TT the Bear's, Middle East, Cantab, All Asia, probably others I'm forgetting right now

up
Voting closed 0

The most T-accessible of the Cambridge libraries.

up
Voting closed 0

It really has. The storefronts that were empty for a while have been filling up.

Truth is, most of the homeless individuals keep to themselves, and I have seen police on patrol and talking to those who are making a ruckus.

A big problem is the lighting on some of the streets. I'd appreciate more streetlights. The area has a dense population, so there would be witnesses if someone were to try to commit a crime, but there are too many shadowy nooks and crannies.

FYI--I've been carjacked, and it happened in the suburbs. Crimes don't always happen in the obvious places. Just saying.

up
Voting closed 0

Most of square, save the bad street lighting, is fine. It's primarily the area at the corner of Mass and Magazine/River/Western that's the problem.

And yes, the business mix is improving, but the druggies are really holding things back. If I were looking to locate my business, I would not want to set up shop near the druggies and have to deal with them all day long.

up
Voting closed 0

is basically a waiting area for the #83 and #91 buses to Inman Square and other parts of Cambridge and Somerville. Is there something especially scary about the riders of these two bus lines? (There are other bus lines in Central Square, but I don't think they stop at this location.)

up
Voting closed 0

Central Square is just gonna become what Harvard is now, a sanitized boring hangout for pretentious yuppie douchebags and idiot tourists. Woo.

up
Voting closed 0

I don't know how to tell you this, but having the bums around doesn't make you any less pretentious.

up
Voting closed 0

I won't. If "sanitized" = "urine free" then sign me up.

up
Voting closed 0

As a central square resident for 4.5 years, I welcome this for the most part. Visitors center is a nice idea, the ambassadors, I don't know. But the biggest problem as written above is the shelters. There's also a needle exchange clinic on Sellers St. I don't know how many times I've stepped over drunk guys, hopped over urine, jumped over a syringe. Hell, my very first time ever in Central had me walking out of the T stop to see a guy with his pants down around his ankles. As somebody wrote above, I doubt the will of the city to ever really change the location of all the shelters and services, and without doing something about that, Central will probably top out in its gentrification. Do I want another Harvard Sq? Not exactly, but it can be better than dodging meth heads, mini bottles, and vomit.

up
Voting closed 0

I lived near Central Square (aka Central Scare) in the distant 90s. It struck me as Cambridge's area to find the feeling of urban grit. What was always impressive though was how quickly the grit gave way to an old urban New England neighborhood feel as soon as I passed First Baptist Church on Magazine Street.

On weekends there was a group of fellows who preached some strange interpretation of the Pentateuch. They even wore costumes which I supposed was to evoke some ancient Hebraic tribe. While I thought they were odd I enjoyed watching and listening to them. They made Central Square a Speaker's Corner. We could use more of that. It made the public space something that was more than merely a place to pass through to get to work or store.

What I liked most about Central Square, but don't know if this applies now, is that it was an area where urban flora and fauna was an appropriate phrase. Gritty rather than shiny, more down to earth than highfalutin. I don't remember if the clothier at Magazine Street which was forced out when the overscaled building was built sold custom made clothes, but I am sure they would have sold custom made and not bespoken clothes.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm sympathetic to the concerns expressed in this thread, but when I think about the idea of cleaning up Central Square, I'm reminded of the sad reality of a cleaned up Kenmore Square. In it's heyday, Kenmore was a very similar place, indeed, quite a bit better when it came to funky stores, music venues, and street life. Today, it is a bedroom for out of town visitors.

Boring. Bleh.

up
Voting closed 0

Couldn't agree more. I don't live in the Central Square area so I'm not going to tell residents to put up with urine so I can experience "urban grit" on occasion, but the bummer is that these people who need help get pushed along to another neighborhood until the real estate agents, artsy types, students, etc. decide that this new neighborhood needs to be upgraded and they get pushed a little further away.

A friend's mother grew up in Central Square a little before the mid-20th century and used to warn us about going to Central Square back in the 80s. Her vision was how far it had fallen from the 30s-50s to the 60s-70s. My vision is how it has been from 80s to today and it's been quite a change. The death of rent control has a lot to do with it. Had this been anywhere but Cambridge it would already be far past where Kenmore Square is now. "The Shoppes at Central"?

up
Voting closed 0