Needham man arraigned on child-porn charges

By adamg on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 1:49pm

Millan A Needham man who worked in Jamaica Plain today became the latest local man to be charged with possession of child porn.

Keith Millan was arraigned on five counts of possession of child pornography in West Roxbury District Court. Judge Mary Ann Driscoll set bail at $25,000 and barred him from computers and children under 16 - although she will let the Department of Children and Families decide whether he can see his own children, the DA's office reports.

Millan's LinkedIn page still lists him as a property manager at Leeder Management, which runs the Perkins Square apartment complex in Jamaica Plain.

Millan was fired last year when his employers discovered run-of-the-mill porn on his company laptop, external hard drive and some CDs, the DA's office says. When the company had somebody reconfigure the computer for reuse, they discovered what looked like pornographic images of children - at which point they called police, the DA's office says. Investigators found "more than 100 photograph and video files depicting adults engaging in explicit sexual activity with young boys and girls ... disturbing, violent images," the DA's office says.

Millan was arraigned in West Roxbury because the computer and storage media were found in Jamaica Plain, the DA's office says.

Innocent, etc.

Neighborhoods:

Topics:

Ad:

Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

You see?....

By Brian Riccio on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 2:00pm.

Another reason to stay away from LinkedIn!

what kind of ridiculous

By anon on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 3:39pm.

what kind of ridiculous response is that? How about: how terrible!

Isn't that kind of implied?....

By Brian Riccio on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 4:23pm.

I mean for God's sake lately every time I turn on the news there's another fucking kiddie porn arrest. It's time to start with the chemical castrations, no?

Citations please.

By Udonymous on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 5:32pm.

Citations please.

Sure, it makes you feel good to think about it - any evidence that it works?

Sure it works

By Pete Nice on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 5:36pm.

I mean it would hurt right? That means it would work.

OK, then,,,how about

By Brian Riccio on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 7:22pm.

real castrations? That ought to send a message,no?

Message about what?

By SwirlyGrrl on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 8:41pm.

That some guys get off thinking about other guy's balls being cut off?

How does this protect society? Explain?

Note: some these guys have tried cutting their own balls off to free themselves from their compulsions ... or submit to chemicals to do the trick so they can live outside of prison - except it only fulfills your sick fantasies. It doesn't seem to cure them of anything.

Here we go!

By Brian Riccio on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 8:46pm.

Ahh..my dear Swirly. As a parent I can't possibly imagine the thoughts running through your head if you found out someone had forced one of your little cherubs into performing disgusting sexual acts for some sicko.

I think that you crossed the

By PeterGriffith5 on Fri, 02/10/2012 - 9:26am.

I think that you crossed the line with Swirly and owe her an apology.

If you disagree with her on a particular issue, you are not doing your argument any favors by using condescending language such as referring to her teen age children as "cherubs" and rhetorically pulling her closer by calling her "my dear Swirly..." as you prepare to suggest that she imagine her children being molested.

To personalize such a public policy question is a type of ad hominine attack. Rather than resorting to cheap, rhetorical moves designed to diminish a debate opponent by making them appear to a callous, uncaring human being.

It smacks of the demagoguery of Bernard Shaw when he asked Mike Dukakis if he would support an irrevocable death penalty for a man who hypothetically raped and murdered Kitty Dukakis. Dukakis answered from a public policy perspective, where Bernard’s question was designed to elicit an answer that Dukakis would be filled with rage and anger.

We get that you’d be outraged if a child in your life would be molested in front of a camera. This hardly makes you unique or more virtuous than anyone else. Diminishing other participants in a discussion about such is nothing more than playground child’s play. Being an internet tough guy is cheap and easy, making a real argument is work. I challenge you to do better.

it's weird, when i first saw

By anon on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 3:53pm.

it's weird, when i first saw dude's photo, my first thought totally wasn't "i bet he got arrested for child porno"