Police: Charlestown teen didn't give up loaded gun without a fight
Boston Police report that when officers from the Youth Violence Strike Force went to speak to a group of teens standing in front of 49 Walford Way around noon on Monday, one of the teens:
Turned from officers holding his waistband and ran into the building locking the door behind him. A quick thinking officer went to the rear door, entered the common area and observed the individual standing in the hallway. As the officer approached, the individual took off running up the stairs. While on the stairs, the officer grabbed the individual and immediately felt a firearm in the waistband of the individual. At the top of the landing the individual continued to resist the officer's commands and a violent struggle ensued. During the struggle, the individual attempted to pull the firearm from his waist area several times. The gang unit officer was able to gain control of the individual and secure the loaded gun, that was taken from the individual's waist area.
Leroy Gales, 18, was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, unlawful possession of ammunition, possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.
Police say the officers were on patrol due to recent gunfire in the area.
Innocent, etc.
Ad:
Comments
Evict his family.
Evict his family.
Boy,
that angry at 7:55 in the morning?! What, did you get up on the wrong side of the bed or something?
If you want to house the scum
If you want to house the scum bring them to your house. I work too hard to pay for this thug's housing. I've got my own bills to worry about.
As I consistently say
You work, so they don't have too
Public housing = doesn't work
Is unemployment/disability a requirement?
Otherwise, how do you know that you aren't just subsidizing McDonalds, Wendy's, Target, etc.?
Oh no
I agree with ya Swirl. We all know that.. for example.. we, the tax payers, subsidize WalMart employees due to their low pay. (i.e. Housing, EBT, Welfare, etc)
I think its income and/or disability.
And, we're going to be paying
And, we're going to be paying even MORE to subsidize Walmart's employees since they are taking away their employees' health care options if they work under 30 hours per week. Greedy cheapskates. Any right wingers out there who think they are true conservatives are NOT if they are still shopping at Walmart. Personally, I neither shop at Walmart nor am I a right winger.
Swirl the Contrarian
Color me shocked that you decided to play devil's advocate. Even more shocked that you didn't follow it up with "I actually saw this kid working at the supermarket this weekend, pretty sure he only sells crack on his off days to support his ill grandmother who I used to play bingo with."
Ya got a death wish or something?
You do know you just committed swirlicide, don't you?
So you broke up with reality
You've made that clear all through this site.
Sorry to mention her name here again. I know how deeply Reality disturbs you.
Oh my god you're sooooo funny
Oh my god you're sooooo funny!
Gotta be honest
That s.g. kind of scares me too.
He'll cross the street
When he sees reality coming, he crosses the street!
Not gonna lie
That was funny anon.
Some of these guys are
Some of these guys are "visitors". BHA and the police need to start investigating whose apartments they "visit" as well.
BHA needs to toughen up
Keep up the good work BPD. Please don't let the Bunker Hill Development turn into Old Colony or Bromley Heath! Not only does it affect the people living there, its also the surrounding areas.
Notice how the home address of many people arrested isn't even in Charlestown? That's the hood rats letting their hood rat friends visit. They act tough because "its the projects". The dealers see a new area to set up shop, they probably can't claim turf in their own neighborhood. Why not cozy up to a desperate female with her own apartment and $50 rent? Throw them out.
It needs to be clear from the moment they sign a lease that there will be no tolerance. Unfortunately BHA doesn't bother doing such things. Has there ever been a manager that walks around and takes notes of locks to be fixed or lights that are out? Or god forbid look around at night or the weekends? Unless HUD gives the heads up that they will be there, nobody does visual inspections.
In the old days (pre federal invasion)
the Housing authority would throw families out for the sport of it. Now everyone is a victim. You want to live there then no felonies, no drugs, no weapons, speak english and get a job.
In theory, you can't live in
In theory, you can't live in subsidized housing projects if you are a convicted felon. In practice, it doesn't work that way because someone else's name is on the lease. My Little Sister lives in a housing project in Cambridge, and this is pretty much how it works. In her own apartment, her mother hasn't had a job of any kind in over two years, uses her child support payments to pay the bills and has her other grown up son living with her. He works and does not pay rent at all. It's kind of awful how much you see people get away with, but there's not much the CHA/BHA can do about it. They can't police everyone who lives in public housing.
Isn't there already a rule
Isn't there already a rule about anyone in the household being found guilty of certain crimes, that the family would have to leave?
I remember the story of a woman who had lived in a housing project (I forget which) and she was a trusted and active member of that housing community, but was threatened with eviction due to a grandson living with her arrested selling drugs and gang ties?
Maybe these rules just aren't enforced, or hard to enforce since someone actually living at a household may not be "legally" living there.
Many people live in places
Many people live in places there aren't allowed to off lease. The people allowing them to live there illegally often face no punishment or get a deal to keep their housing in exchange for testimony.
Not the family
This guy, being 18, will not likely be allowed to live there any longer once certain legal requirements are met. Due process and all that.
If he's already been kicked out or is otherwise not supposed to be living there, the family may have a problem.
Nope, whole family
I used to work for a company the did affordable housing and I believe that we were required to evict the household if a member or even invitee was selling drugs (I forget if conviction was required). The idea being that there were wait lists up to 8 years long of people who needed that slot. And that as landlord, we could be held liable for not getting rid of the problem.
Different states have different eviction processes and it can take a very long time to evict a household in MA.
Section 8
Or BHA?
Its
a little different when you talking about a tax funded housing project versus subsidized housing.
Ineligibility Because of
Ineligibility Because of Criminal Activity (24 CFR § 960.204)
Public Housing Authorities are required to prohibit admission of families with members:
~Part 2 – Chapter 2 Eligibility for Admission: Page 28~
Public Housing Occupancy Guidebook
Involvement in Criminal Activity on the Part of Any Applicant Family Member that Would Adversely Affect the Health, Safety or Right to Peaceful Enjoyment of the Premises by Other Tenants (24 CFR § 960.203(c)(3) and 960.204)
PHAs are required to check an applicant’s history of criminal activity for a history of crimes that would be lease violations if they were committed by a public housing resident. Before the screening steps are examined, consider that certain actions and behaviors require a rejection of an applicant:
~Part 2 – Chapter 4 Qualification for Admission: Page 53~
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_10760.pdf
Nonsense!
Seeing how I think I'm the only poster here who has actually lived in the BH projects (and at 49 Walford Way once), do any of you have any idea how many men came to live with their significant others in their project apartments when they got out of the can? And no one ever said a word? All of them.
There are rules
for some and "special consideration" given to others.
Not about the family. And
Not about the family. And you are referencing Bromley-Heath TMC leader Mildred Hailey, whose two grandsons were. Excerpts from the article I linked below:
But crisis came in 1998, when two of Hailey’s grandsons were arrested in a massive drug raid at the development. Amid allegations that the TMC failed to evict people convicted of drug-dealing, the BHA deposed Hailey and took over management for a year.
In 1999, one of Hailey’s sons was arrested in her apartment on a homicide charge, and the following year, another of her sons was charged with dealing drugs there. There was no sign that Hailey was aware of any of those alleged crimes, but public scrutiny of TMC increased.
http://jamaicaplaingazette.com/2012/02/17/bromley-heath-leader-retires-b...
In the old days
Nobody black could live there either.
That's why the Feds "invaded".
Walford Way You Say?
Pat yourself on the back everyone. You have been paying this nice young gentlman's rent within the Bunker Hill Projects and you will get to support him further while he resides at The Other Nashua Street Residences and then at The South Bay Terraces.
Good work BPD on the bust.
Wanna bet how many teachers
Wanna bet how many teachers and students he has prevented from providing or receiving a quality public school education by being disruptive?
How do you know where he lives?
Friend of yours?
suprised
reaching for the waistband its surprising he is still around for the trip to south bay
I disagree. This shouldn't be
I disagree. This shouldn't be surprising. There was no need for anyone to get shot. This officer acted in a brave manner and saved two lives. The young man's and his own. This officer has shown that you don't need to shoot first and ask questions later. That we can address crime and dangerous activity without killing people. I hope the officer receives recognition for this work.
I disagree with your disagreement
So basically there's no need for a cop to shoot a suspect, until of course that cop is being shot at?
-He evaded police. While evading he was seen holding his waistband.
-When the cop caught up to him, he confirmed actually feeling a gun in his waistband.
-A violent struggle ensues, and the suspect reportedly reaches for his waistband.
I dunno, that seems justifiable to me.
Hear hear
I don't side with cops much these days, but good work here. Shame he didn't blow the little criminal's head off once he reached for the waistband.
Considering a move
You'll love North Carolina. Reaching for an ID that the cop just asked for is a summary execution offense there.
False
"You'll love North Carolina. Reaching for an ID that the cop just asked for is a summary execution offense there."
That was South Carolina, not NC.
Also NYC
Also NYC - Amadou Diallo
nice strawman
nice strawman
Not a strawman
Really happened in SC: http://abcnews.go.com/US/dashcam-captures-south-carolina-trooper-shootin...
It has happened in North Carolina, too: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/28/us-usa-ncarolina-police-idUSBR...
It can happen anywhere....
To any human being with a gun. Not always black and white playing the "let's see what I pull out if my pocket and how fast game"
I don't think the area of the country matters for that, that stuff can happen anywhere.
Really?
All the more reason we need non-police investigation of police - like Canada is putting into place.
As long as courts, judges and lawyers have the final say.....
And not people like you. Because people like you will get overulled by those judges, courts, lawyers and others who know the law. It saves everyone money in the long run.
No police officer will ever have a problem with non-police investigating the police. Studies have actually shown that Internal Affairs departments find officers guilty more than non-police investigations*
* (Americans foe Effective Law Enforcment "police civilian review Boards AELE defense manual, Brief 82-3 (San Fransisco: AELE, 1982. 1997.) and Douglas Perez, 'Common Sense about Police Review (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994)
How did we end up here
How does one compare A) someone handing over their license in a show of compliance and getting shot vs. B) having a suspect evade you while holding their waistband, then getting into a violent struggle with the suspect, then actually FEELING that handgun in their waistband, and then that suspect actually REACHING for that waistband?
Because that guy could have had a bag of weed or a toy gun....
Then people would all accuse the cop of using too much force and/or being too stupid for not knowing what a real threat is.
No 'resisting arrest' or
No 'resisting arrest' or 'assaulting an officer' charge?
Can we not refer to 18 year
Can we not refer to 18 year old people as 'teens'? Sure, they are technically, but it smells of PC and 'tolerance'.
What part of eighTEEN
is unclear?
Which is why I said
Which is why I said technically.
Saying teen to describe an 18 year old thug is trying to paint a certain picture.
It's like calling them youths, completely correct but not accurate.
There is a world of different between thirteen and fourteen.
But hey, caps=right.
Balance...
We need to remember that for every Ferguson, there is probably a story like this. Bravo to the officers who caught this kid, and let's hope the kid is put away, not simply released.
And by the way, I'm not just knee-jerk pro-cop. I think their actions are flat-out wrong, or deserving of serious investigation in a lot of situations. But this story is a good reminder of the perspective we need to keep.
It might be nice
If there were some statistics to back up what you said here.
The problem is, these are not systematically collected or aggregated in any meaningful way.
Sounds like BPD is doing a decent job of training (as we see here) and of collecting information (as we see on the other thread).
I believe, now the head of
I believe, now the head of house holds should know what's going on In their apartments. There are some good hard working people that raise good children that reside in projects, but it is always shadowed by the bad. It's not fair when your spouse & yourself work 2 JOBS and your college children also work and your paying for school, rent $1800 and bills & food and its hard to make ends meet, and your neighbors are selling their food stamps to buy drugs, and paying $11.00 for rent for the same apartment you have, free medical insurance, when your paying, the system just doesn't seem fair to the working people.
" the system just doesn't seem fair to the working people."
Its NOT. Particularly when we have the same expenses, plus the cost to help off-set theirs.
There really is no excuse for
There really is no excuse for a head of household to not know what is in their own apartment. Denial that your child/relative/partner is into drugs, gangs, and violence is not acceptable.
The management goes home at
The management goes home at 5pm and could care less until someone makes a big enough stink in the office or goes above their heads.
If BHA had a stronger backbone they would make sure that new tenants knew ALL of the rules and that there would be consequences for breaking them before they were even allowed to sign a lease. But its all about paperwork, pushing them in and out. Why else would people feel so free as to move in, and a week later be having loud parties, smoking weed and cigarettes, (there is a no smoking policy by the way), and disrupting the neighborhood in many various ways. Because nobody in management cares and its obvious, thats why. BHA shuffles its managers around. Good luck if you DO get a good one, since they will probably remove them soon enough and the development will once again be at the mercy of the next person who may or may not feel like working.
Its a shame that the peaceful, nice, working families who don't have a lot of options have to worry about if the next empty apartment to be filled will turn the whole block dangerous.
You have to prove the alleged violations!
I'm aware of people who rent out their BHA apartments while they travel back and forth to the DR. If you make things easy to get and do not have a nosey manager onsite who has a backbone your screwed. BHA is slipping backwards.