Hey, there! Log in / Register

How do you get to Fenway?

Seen inside the Copley Square outbound stop.

IMAGE(http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/oo139/JohnAKeith/Random/mbta_copley.jpg)


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

From the Bad Timing file

AlertNewEngland reports that about noon, a snowblower caught fire on Emerson Street in Wilmington.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

DNA from blood on a sneaker might mean new trial for two convicted of brutal North End double murder

The Supreme Judicial Court today ordered a Superior Court judge to consider whether a DNA sample from the sneaker of one of three men convicted of pumping more than 20 rounds into two men in 1986 warrants a new trial.

Frank DiBenedetto and Louis R. Costa were convicted, along with Paul Tanso, of first-degree murder for the shooting deaths of Joseph John Bottari and Frank Angelo Chiuchiolo in a North End park on Feb. 19, 1986. Chiuchiolo had been shot seven times, five times in the head, and Bottari had been shot sixteen times, six times in the head.

The three were convicted in part based on testimony from a man who knew the three and claimed he saw them murder Bottari and Chiuchiolo and from a lawyer who went to his window to investigate what he thought were fireworks but which turned out to be flashes from the murder weapons in the nearby park.

In 2005, however, DiBennedetto and Costa filed for a new trial based on DNA sampling - unavailable at the time of his trial - that he said showed the blood found on his sneaker did not contain DNA from either victim. Given the violence of the deaths and the amount of blood, they said this amounted to vindication that they were innocent because somebody who had repeatedly shot two men at point-blank range would be unable to avoid blood spatter from them.

In its ruling the court agreed the DNA testing met one of two accepted standards for overturning a verdict: That it was new evidence. And they agreed that the testimony from the two witnesses was suspect - one because he changed his story repeatedly, the other because he was testifying some eight years after the murder.

However, the justices added that that is not necessarily enough to overturn the rest of the case against the two. That, the court ruled, is up to a Superior Court judge to consider.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

State's highest court to Dorchester man: Enough, already

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled today it is fed up with a Dorchester man who keeps filing lawsuits and appeals against judges, court clerks, prosecutors, police and his own lawyer.

The court took the unusual step of ordering court clerks to refuse to even accept a single filing from Lawrence Watson "unless it is accompanied by a motion for leave to file, and shall not docket the petition or appeal unless and until the full court grants the motion on making a preliminary determination that the petitioner has no other adequate remedy and that he has furnished the court with a record that substantiates his claims."

The justices were so fed up their ruling doesn't even specify the basic issue over which Watson filed five appeals against individual SJC justices, but says it is tired of hearing appeals with absolutely no merit or basis in law. Last year, the court ruled against Watson in an ongoing effort to get his name expunged from court records stemming from a 2003 assault case in Dorchester District Court. And the court warned him then to knock it off.

In the full court alone, not including the five appeals that are currently before us, we have already decided sixteen appeals in four years, each of which sought full court review of single justice denials of his petitions for extraordinary relief. In each instance we affirmed the single justice's ruling. All of these cases were meritless. All of the petitions and appeals failed for the same reasons, i.e., because Watson had available to him adequate alternative remedies, because he had failed to provide a record substantiating his allegations and supporting his claims, or both.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

You did get a flu shot this time, right?

The Boston Public Health Commission reports a sharp rise in flu cases in the under-5 set likely signals the start of more widespread flu cases among adults.

Emergency-room visits for flu-like symptoms in general is up sharply over the past month, but especially among children under 5, the commission said today. Lab-test sampling - not everybody who shows up at an ER with fevery aches has samples sent for testing - shows 21% of cases are now among kids under 5, the commission said.

"If we're seeing this level of flu activity in children, then adults are likely to soon follow," said Dr. Anita Barry, director of the Infectious Disease Bureau "Influenza often starts in a community in children, then spreads to adults."

Barry said it's not too late to get a flu shot, which is now recommended for everybody over the age of six months.

Free flu clinics (there's one Friday in Uphams Corner).


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Menino still wants to close branch libraries


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

What do you call a B line with dead trains at both BC and BU?

Dead. Sorry, no joke here.

This comes after D service was interrupted by a dead train at Fenway and C service by an equally non-viable train at Kenmore. No reports from the E yet, but it's early.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Local Groupon clone claims AOL, Patch stole its business idea, name

Waltham-based Wow What Savings wants at least $5 million from AOL and its Patch subsidiary for setting up a similarly cloned group-buying site at wow.com.

In its lawsuit, originally filed in state courts but recently transferred to US District Court in Boston, Wow What Savings charges that AOL launched its site only after a meeting between Wow What Savings owner Todd Riderman and Patrick Purcell Jr., publisher of AOL's hyperlocal Patch sites in New England (Ed. note: He's Herald Publisher Patrick Purcell's son).

Todd Rideman, whose own site started up in August, 2009, claims he met with Purcell at a Belmont Starbucks this past summer, described his company's business model and eventually offered to do business with Patch.

After some followup discussions, Rideman claims, Purcell told him AOL had no interest in a Groupon cline.

Purcell was fully aware that wowwhatsavings.com called itself "Wow," as Rideman always referred to his business as "Wow on it when he met Purcell in June or July 2010.

This past November, AOL launched wow.com to offer group discounts on stuff - with Boston one of its initial markets, just like Wow What Savings.

Since then, Wow What Savings charges, its business is down 10% and both business owners and consumers are becoming increasingly confused. The suit alleges a North End restaurant owner agreed to a deal with wow.com thinking it was Wow What Savings.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

MBTA bus driver suspended for doing what probably every school-bus driver, ever, has dreamed of doing

The Herald reports the MBTA has suspended a driver who basically locked a bunch of Boston Latin School students in and then took them for an angry ride off her route after some pranksters kept pushing the stop strip and wouldn't fess up. Among the mini-hostages: Tom Menino's granddaughter.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Harvard Square loses creperie

The Crimson reports the demise of Arrow Street Crepes.


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Pages