Hey, there! Log in / Register

Governor proposes one of those little paper-cut bandages for MBTA hemorrhaging

Patrick says let's give roughly $40 million in unspent snow-plowing money to the MBTA, but what about next year?

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Amazing how the state and its agencies (and the city) balance their budget. They keep eliminating jobs and then take the savings and pass on salary and bennie hikes to the remaining workers so we never really save any money and now something like almost 25% of the state's workers are making over 6 figures. Not 100% sure about the state - but except for one year the city's budget has been going up about 3% a year - coupled with staff reductions the average city employee has seen about a 4% annual increase in total comp.

So either these jobs that we got rid of weren't necessary or we get less service, probably a combination of both. At what point does the state begin to realize that there really is nowhere left to cut or that basically we the people are paying more taxes on wages without raises so that the public employees can get their annual COL increases with no cuts to bennies and pensions. Eventually it will start to hurt bad enough (like they are doing with the T this year) so we'll just say "ok raise the fares/taxes" or they'll say we need more "public/private partnerships" for things we used to be able to afford on the public dime.

We ARE the proverbial frogs in the boiling pot of water. Either we jump or grow teeth and bite back.

up
Voting closed 0

> now something like almost 25% of the state's workers are making
> over 6 figures

Holy cow! Over six figure means seven figure. And seven figure means over one million a year. I want one of these fabulous $million+ state salaries too. ;~}

But -- agreed that this is a pretty pathetic response to a problem that needs a real solution.

up
Voting closed 0

Just using it as a figure of speech and I guess I was one figure too many :-)

up
Voting closed 0

25%? Can you back that up with facts, not howie-say?

Are you including benefits?

Pensions are a bit of fluff private workers no longer have access too, but I'm doubting the mean and median state worker is making 7 figures.

up
Voting closed 0

I believe the Herald (not Howie) reported that about 6800 employees earned over $100k last year (wages only). I believe there are about 30,000 state employees. That's about 23% to be more precise if the 30,000 state employee figure is correct.

up
Voting closed 0

He MEANT over five figures. ;~}

up
Voting closed 0

Designed to distract us from the fact that the Governor has done absolutely NOTHING to help correct the funding situation for the MBTA. Comes with a nice little pat on the head too, I'm sure.

up
Voting closed 0

The strategy seems to be:
1) Have a moderate fare increase and maybe a small number of cuts this year to scrape by
2) Wait for the local elections in November
3) Look for a permanent statewide solution to transportation funding after the elections

up
Voting closed 0

4) Go to 1.

up
Voting closed 0

Or we could realize that the MBTA is a useful thing, and simply pay for it out of general funds. Like, you know, snow removal.

up
Voting closed 0

It may be a bandaid but it seems like a step in the right direction :) -Mea www.hertrainstories.blogspot.com

up
Voting closed 0

divert funds from MBTA capital projects to keep the system operating instead of raiding unused snow removal funds that should be set aside as a hedge against next winter's possible expenses.

up
Voting closed 0

Because most of the capital projects make use of federal money that can only be used for capital projects.

up
Voting closed 0

another five years of half a dozen community meetings every two weeks to decide such life and death issues like "what's the best colors for station shelters" and "OMG - how dare you propose building an active maintenace facility on the site of an abandonded railroad yard"

But I guess it's better to risk having an underfunded snow budget for next winter than to deprive the masses of these "essential" functions.

up
Voting closed 0

... if I've heard this one before.

Federal Money:States != MA State Money:towns

MA's tendency to let politicians reclassify the purpose of money from the Feds in order to move it to pet projects instead of spend it on what they were supposed to spend it on is what got us in this mess to start with - and a big reason we have trouble getting federal funds at all from what the FHWA people we work with have to say.

If you want to keep paying in and not getting back, keep it up.

up
Voting closed 0

to provide a quick "stop-gap" measure to keep the T running is doing the exact same thing. Reclassifying the purpose of money - even though it's just from one state account to another.

And what happens next year if we have an worse than average winter. Where will we get the additional money for snow removal from then?

up
Voting closed 0

Make the people who benefit pay for it.

Raise the gas tax.

Also, the snow removal budget isn't federal money - they can play with the purpose of that all they want.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm curious to know if the union employees are still getting pay raises every year, along with bonuses.

I worked for a company which was in financial trouble (yes, worked, as in no longer, they ran out of money). The first thing they did to try and get things under control is institute a pay cut. All employees got a 10% cut, while all of upper management got a %20 cut. As a last resort, they laid off employees. This kept the business from going completely under, and they have since started rehiring employees.

With this said, it seems reasonable to enforce a salary freeze, a pay cut for upper management, and a hiring freeze for non-critical positions. It also seems beyond wrong to make the T hire back union employees who have been rightfully fired, AND giving them backpay wages.

up
Voting closed 0

Where on earth did you get the idea that T employees get bonuses?

up
Voting closed 0

The T mess has been summarized at various times. The "D'Allesandro Report" from November 2009 has this summary of staffing costs:

The MBTA currently employs 6,346 workers, of which roughly 600 are
in part-time jobs.

All but 263 of these workers are represented by one of 28 unions.
• Total headcount at the MBTA is actually down by approximately
200 since the Forward Funding Plan began, while total payroll and
benefits costs have increased.
• Total payroll and benefits costs increased from $412.8M to
$548.9M between FY01 and FY08 due to increases in wage, health
care and pension costs.
• This cumulatively exceeded Finance Plan projections by $113M.
• Between FY01 and FY08, the unionized workers received
average annual wage increases of 3.0%, while MBTA executives
received average annual increases of 1.9%.
• Non-union MBTA employees have not received wage increases
since 2005.
• Wage increases for union workers are comparable to the 3.5%
annual growth in the Consumer Price Index-Urban Boston and
Massachusetts median household income for the same time period.
• The MBTA’s wage rates and total wage costs are similar to those
of other top U.S. transit systems, as is shown in the table at left.

and

MBTA Hourly Wages: Comparison of Ten Largest Transit Agencies
Transit System || Operator Top Rate
San Francisco || $29.19
New York City || $26.92
Chicago || $26.87
Boston || $26.56
Washington || $25.93
Seattle || $25.34
New Jersey || $24.27
Philadelphia || $23.54
Los Angeles || $21.27
Atlanta || $19.25
(As of 1/2008)

The Herald recently stated that the MBTA has 5,984 employees, of which 631 are earning $100,000 or more. Davey has stated that they are at an all-time low for staff. Instead of hiring they've been relying on overtime. Last year's snow resulted in a lot of OT for mechanics (remember the hairnets?).

According to the Herald's data from 2010 of the top 40 earners 22 of them were Transit Police. This mirrors what you'll see if you look at the top earners of every municipal govt in the Commonwealth (with the possible exception of the Housing guy in Chelsea) -- and yet I don't see anyone parroting the mantra of cut the cops! cut the cops!

There is a plan afoot to transfer the T Police to the Staties which would take them off the MBTA's budget and remove a bunch of the most feared and hated creatures this side of the Nasgûl, the SIX FIGURE PUBLIC SERVANTS. Of course we'll still be paying them. Probably paying them more actually because we'll have to spring for the Smoky Bear hats and jackboots (and I suspect Staties have a better deal than T cops generally, but someone else would have to confirm that).

I think we could go with CityYear kids and the guys who sell Spare Change and save lots of money. How hard can it be to drive a bus full of precious snow flakes? And just think of all the money we'd save. Fire all the staff of the MBTA and run it with volunteers and hobos and you'd be all set!

up
Voting closed 0

We could do it with fewer than 28 unions. But in order to do it well we would of course require the indentured servitude of one "Ron Newman".

up
Voting closed 0

I guess global warming is the T's bailout plan...

up
Voting closed 0

When the red line came to a screeching halt at rush hour yesterday, and we sat at Harvard for 10 minutes before being booted out (and still no service when the 96 bus arrived nearly 20 minutes later ...), I texted to my husband that I was late due to a Devalled train north of Harvard.

Every time there is a T fail, we should all work "Deval"into it. As in "I was late to work because the T Deval-ved again" or "there was a stalled and Devalled train halting service again".

up
Voting closed 0