This restaurant should be grateful they got off with only losing their liquor license for a week (since they can still be open). I'm shocked their didn't lose their liquor license for a month, given the quantity of violations & lies told to inspectors. I hope that any future covid violations will close this restaurant entirely for a few weeks.
… Servia their license as much as they did it to themselves.
A week suspension is a thrashing with a wet cocktail napkin. A couple of months might actually teach them a lesson. As much for serving minors as for disregarding Covid guidelines.
The establishment has a well-established legal obligation to actively work to ensure that they're not serving minors. Or allowing inappropriate mask-free activities. Or not locking the freaking door.
Adam, you're great at not letting journalists blame automobiles for the poor decisions of automobile drivers. But this headline makes it clear that some BC students are solely responsible for this lawbreaking when your own writeup makes it clear that the restaurant was complicit or even willingly participating in the law breaking -- and the restaurant has a more significant legal responsibility than the students do.
Comments
This restaurant should be
This restaurant should be grateful they got off with only losing their liquor license for a week (since they can still be open). I'm shocked their didn't lose their liquor license for a month, given the quantity of violations & lies told to inspectors. I hope that any future covid violations will close this restaurant entirely for a few weeks.
Non Serviam
will be their name for the next week.
Eh, the underage BC students didn’t cost..
… Servia their license as much as they did it to themselves.
A week suspension is a thrashing with a wet cocktail napkin. A couple of months might actually teach them a lesson. As much for serving minors as for disregarding Covid guidelines.
Headline bias
The establishment has a well-established legal obligation to actively work to ensure that they're not serving minors. Or allowing inappropriate mask-free activities. Or not locking the freaking door.
Adam, you're great at not letting journalists blame automobiles for the poor decisions of automobile drivers. But this headline makes it clear that some BC students are solely responsible for this lawbreaking when your own writeup makes it clear that the restaurant was complicit or even willingly participating in the law breaking -- and the restaurant has a more significant legal responsibility than the students do.